Hi All,

Thanks for your replies.

How Man's pictures tell me that what is on the grounds of the museum in 2004 is used in the final reconstruction. However, some of you may not be fully convinced that those are the original pieces from the mountain. It is understandable, and an good for the museum to have documented material about this.  I do not have many pictures of CNAC #53 in its original state in the mountain. My computer extracts frames out of the dvd from Fletcher's documentary. Mr. Ge Shuya has given me his pictures of CNAC #53 as it was when it was found in the mountain.

I will work in trying to use those pictures to compare the pieces in How Man's 2004 pictures. Anyone wanting to share any images they have please do. It will help me use them in the comparison. Of course photo comparisons like these are not definitive proof of anything, but it may help us in our speculations.

Big question:  Are the pieces on the ground (in the 2004 picture) enough to make a finish product without the need to bring in another airplane? I mean that if what is on the ground came form the mountain, and all of it is used in the final product, then why bring in another airplane? I used to think that another plane was needed because there were not enough pieces of the original plane, but after seeing the pictures, I have doubts about the need to use another airplane.  Specially if resources and funds are limited.

Another thing, can I ask for your suggestions? We are in the process of negotiating with government agencies involved with the museum in Pienma. As I say in my letter, we want to make a diagram of the airplane showing what is original and what is not. What kind of document, proof can satisfy most of you? Does it matter who makes the diagram? If so, what kind of individuals do you suggest should get involved in this process? Any ideas on this will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Diego Kusak 

 

RETURN